Hi, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, I think we should do this in general. We already have one example (e.g. > ACPI IVARs start at 100 so that things like the ACPI PCI bus driver can > provide both ACPI and PCI IVARs to child devices). I think we should assign > each bus it's own IVAR range. It would make it easier to determine if a > specific IVAR is event supported. Certainly I think ISA and PCI at a minimum > should be changed to start at, say, 200 and 300. > What's the point doing that ? Let's just resign to the conclusion that FreeBSD devices' subsystem provides no dynamic way for a client device to deals with multiple bus driver. Instead all possible combination have to be harcoded and hand-crafted, when at all possible, to look like they're coming from a single bus...
But again, newbus is 14 years old... - Arnaud _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
