Ryan Stone wrote: > Are you running make with -j something? no way
> C++ compilers seem to be much more memory hungry than straight C > compilers. c++ is far too crufty and clever. no free lunch. Michael Butler wrote: > The only other option I can think of is to reduce the level of > optimization, i.e. use '-O' in lieu of '-O2', if you can afford the > (relatively small) performance loss, trying now. it takes 840 mins to run, so ... the only thing a night's sleep got me was the idea of attaching an external sata drive and putting swap on it. randy _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
