On 24.07.2013 14:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 24.07.2013 13:34, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:22:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Bapt tells me that there are FUSE issues in the most recent -HEAD and
it's stopping poudriere from running.
Nah poudriere does not use yet fuse :)
What's the story here?
I was about to mail you :)
It is broken since r248084 apparently the update on the fuse_kernel.h you did is
not in sync with fusefs-libs, resulting in no filesystem to properly work.
Do you have any insight on the reason of the changes? and I should look at?
The change came from upstream. Does it help to revert it all?
Another option could be to teach the port to use the kernel header
but it doesn't look like that would work either :(.
Yes reverting will help r248084 is the last known working revision.
I am perfectly OK with reverting, of course.
Updating the header should be done with modification on the code itself to
implement the missing bits. has some things has changed, I have seen some
interesting things https://github.com/bfleischer/fuse-macosx I might probably
have a look at it later.
I see, there are least two macosx fuse forks but it appears they
were merged into osxfuse.
Things become rather confusing since we are using the linux fuse-libs
with yet another header and NetBSD has a completely different
implementation using puffs with librefuse/libperfuse.
For now let's just fix things :).
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
