On 08/25/13 18:41, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be >> compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports >> that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of >> ports that can't be compiled with clang but fill fine on lang/gcc. >> >> I'll gonna recheck whether lang/gcc42 is sufficient for them. But I >> have that bad feeling... > If there are ports that use USE_GCC=any and do not build with > lang/gcc, these should have USE_GCC=4.2 -- without a '+'! -- > not USE_GCC=any. > > It'll be great if you can fix any such port.
It would be particularly nice if we had a port with FreeBSD's many patches to 4.2. lang/gcc42 (and 46 and lang/gcc) do not build on powerpc64, for example, while our in-tree GCC does. -Nathan _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
