On Sep 17, 2013 4:31 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 17 September 2013 16:22, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:56 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > ... I'd rather see if we can actually separate out things some more so > > > these builds can shrink. > > > > > > Eg, if there's malloc related functions that aren't used, maybe we should > > > break malloc down into a directory full of functions. > > > > > > > Why is that better than using this automated solution? > > > > Not everyone is going to run clang on their target development platform? :-) > > Personally I'd rather structure my work to behave better instead of doing > something that relies on a specific tool/suite to be able to optimise. >
Gcc also supports this. I used it when generating builds with newlib for microcontrollers at a previous job. -Justin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
