There.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisq...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from > 10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others. > This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but > it isn't stable enough for building a 3rd party application. If I reinstall > the base with CURRENT from 10/07/13 to present, will it be stable enough > for building 3rd party? I had tried to extract /base and others to the > system while running it. I did not extract from an ISO/img to a cleanly > formatted system. > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Steve Kargl < > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: >> > Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications? >> > >> >> Huh? What do you mean? People have been running freebsd-current >> for years and porting applications to FreeBSD. Alpha is simply >> a point in time for freebsd-current. >> >> -- >> Steve >> > >
$ lynx /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9: Undefined symbol "libiconv_set_relocation_prefix" $ $ firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so: /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "libiconv" Couldn't load XPCOM. $
_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
