Hi! Would you please create a PR with the patches attached? That way it's not lost.
Thanks! -a On 24 October 2013 06:56, Alexandre Martins <alexandre.mart...@netasq.com>wrote: > Dear, > > We have seen some issues with the VIA VX900 chipset. The main trouble is > that > some SATA hard drive are not seen by the kernel (BIOS and boot-loader are > OK). > > After investigations, it seems that during the initialisation of the > controler, some reset commands are send via "ata_via_sata_reset" fonction. > Into the chipset documentation, there is a warning about successive reset > commands, and software must waiting the "BUSY" flag is clear, before send > another reset. I have added a "DELAY(10000)" between the second call of > "ata_sata_phy_reset" and the call of "ata_generic_reset" and the problem > disapear. > > I also made a more complex fix which check the "BUSY" flag. > > Which fix of delai checking is the better one ? > > Best Regards > > -- > Alexandre Martins > NETASQ -- We secure IT > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
