On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:27:49 +0200 Tijl Coosemans <t...@coosemans.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:18:15 +0300 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:10:44 +0100 symbol...@gmx.com wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>> 3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it to be ready > >>> for MFC for a 10.1 release. > >>> 4) Delay 10.0 until this has matured enough in HEAD, then release it. > >>> > >>> I really want to see more updated xorg support but the timing of it all > >>> feels a little overly rushed for a 10.0 release target. > >>> > >>> What do others think? > >> > >> FWIW, I'm really looking forward to newcons but I don't think it should > >> be rushed into a release. (3) Seems prudent. > > > > Anyway it is optional. > > > > s/device vt/#device vt/ > > s/#device sc/device sc/ > > > > and you in the old, well known world :) > > I think you need to remove the kernel config changes from the patch > and keep syscons the default for now. There's no problem with putting > experimental code in HEAD but it can't be the default from day 1. Yeah, exact, it is enabled in patch just for easy testing. Thanks! WBW -- Aleksandr Rybalko <r...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"