On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:54:52AM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be >>> mixed. The internal implementations are usually completely different. >>> This is not really news at all, certainly not to the ports people. :-) >> >> That said, it should still be possible to mix them in different >> libraries. The constraint from the wiki still applies: if you >> don't use STL types at library boundaries, then it should still >> work. If you do, then the libc++ and libstdc++ symbols will be >> mangled differently and so you will get link-time errors. >> >> In theory, if it links it should run... >> > > And in practice, it is broken. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-November/046565.html > > QED
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with: env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave Some very light testing indicates that it is working. Of course, this is not ideal. Maybe this gives a clue how to fix the octave port properly. Cheers, Jan Henrik _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"