In message <caj-vmomc6cmuo__etm7x6w8hpg8mafl2stepdsz4jn0xn6m...@mail.gmail.com> , Adrian Chadd writes:
>> The compiler authors take the undefined part there as a blanket to perform >> optimizations which are assuming that signed overflow cannot happen. That's sufficient explanation for me to support your proposal. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"