On 29.01.2014 16:42, David Chisnall wrote:
On 29 Jan 2014, at 15:37, Michael Schmiedgen <schmied...@gmx.net> wrote:
On 29.01.2014 16:16, David Chisnall wrote:
On 29 Jan 2014, at 15:08, Michael Schmiedgen <schmied...@gmx.net> wrote:
I thought OpenMP will be an integral part of LLVM/clang in near future,
at least the front-end part? It seems there are plans to even integrate
the runtime in the llvm project source tree:
Ok, so llvm/clang 3.4 obviously will not ship with OpenMP, but maybe
Active development happens in Intel's tree, and is slowly being merged
upstream. Eventually, Clang will have full OpenMP 4 support, but Intel's tree
will have it first and there is likely to be a lag before it makes it into
As such, it would make sense to have a port as a stop-gap until it is ready.
Ah, ok, that makes sense. Thanks for explanation.
BTW very amusing *and* very informative bsdtalk/vBSDCon2013 talk a while
ago, thanks for that! :)
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"