On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is
> the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting?
> I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.

You've provided next to no context.  What is the question?  What thread
are you referring to?  If this is the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be
vastly more appropriate than -current.

-- Brooks

Attachment: pgpRX09Q7lnzF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to