On Mon, 12 May 2014 19:51:21 -0400 George Mitchell <george+free...@m5p.com> wrote:
> On 05/12/14 11:25, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > [...] > > > > Is there any reason not to have kbdmux be mandatory at this point? > > [...] > > Does this mean mandatory in the sense that the kbdmux driver always > gets built and loaded, or that the kbdmux driver must always be in > operation (treating all keyboard-like devices as a single unified > source of keystrokes)? I could live with the first, but there are > definitely times that I want multiple independent keyboards on a > system to be considered unrelated to one another. -- George kbdmux able to manage keyboard set, so you can attach and detach some keyboards. (But I did not test it long ago for vt(4)) > > _______________________________________________ > firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Thanks! WBW -- Aleksandr Rybalko <r...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"