On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:08 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 18.05.2014 20:38, Ian Lepore пишет: > > On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 20:09 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> 18.05.2014 19:48, Boris Samorodov пишет: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> The system: > >>> ----- > >>> % uname -a > >>> FreeBSD bb052.bsnet 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #92 r266163: Thu > >>> May 15 23:22:26 SAMT 2014 > >>> bsam@bb052.bsnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB64X amd64 > >>> > >>> % clang --version > >>> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 > >>> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0 > >>> Thread model: posix > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> While cross-compiling (sources r266396) I get: > >>> ----- > >>> % make -C /usr/src ARCH=arm TARGET_ARCH=armv6 buildworld > >> > >> Hm, at https://wiki.freebsd.org/EmbeddedHandbook one more option > >> is listed: "TARGET_CPUTYPE=armv6". Trying this. > >> > >>> [...] > >>> ===> lib/clang/liblldbAPI (all) > >>> c++ -O -pipe > >>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/include > >>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../ > >>> ../contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/source > >>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../../contrib/llvm/include > >>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAP > >>> I/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include > >>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/source/API > >>> -I. -I > >>> /usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include > >>> -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MA > >>> CROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -fno-strict-aliasing > >>> -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"armv6-gnueabi-freebsd11.0\" > >>> -DLLVM_HOST_TRIP > >>> LE=\"armv6-unknown-freebsd11.0\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" > >>> -Qunused-arguments -std=c++11 -DLLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON -fno-exceptions -f > >>> no-rtti -Wno-c++11-extensions -c > >>> /usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/lldb/source/API/SBAddress.cpp > >>> -o SB > >>> Address.o > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s: Assembler messages: > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:92: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r1]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:141: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:311: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r8,r9,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:312: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `strexd r1,r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:320: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:325: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:329: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:330: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `strexd r2,r4,r5,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:379: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r0,r1,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:507: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:511: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:512: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `strexd r2,r8,r9,[r0]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:665: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r4,r5,[r1]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:671: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r6,r7,[r1]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:678: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexd r2,r3,[r1]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:679: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `strexd r2,r6,r7,[r1]' > >>> /tmp/SBAddress-9939f3.s:739: Error: selected processor does not support > >>> `ldrexdne r0,r1,[r0]' > >>> c++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > >>> invocation) > >>> *** Error code 1 > >>> > >>> Stop. > >>> make[6]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/clang/liblldbAPI > >>> *** Error code 1 > >>> ----- > > > > While I don't think it should affect this problem, "ARCH=arm" isn't > > needed. If anything it would be TARGET=arm, but that's implied by the > > TARGET_ARCH=armv6. > > You are right, that didn't help. The build has faild with the same > error. > > > I suspect the problems you're seeing are more fallout from all the > > recent WITH/WITHOUT build system changes. I've been so focused on doing > > arm MFCs for the past week I haven't tried to build -current for a few > > days. > > > > Since 10-stable is now in sync [1] with -current for arm stuff, but > > doesn't have all the recent build system changes, that might be a > > workable alternative for you for now... just build 10-stable instead of > > -current. > > Well, the thing is I don't have any 10-stable... > > > [1] mostly -- I'm still finding a few misc changesets that I missed on > > the first pass, and build/run testing of 10-stable on arm is just > > beginning. > > It's definitely not my day -- crochet build failed with: > ----- > --- all_subdir_libllvmarmcodegen --- > /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmarmcodegen/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp:3687:15: > error: no member named > 'VLD1d64TPseudoWB_fixed' in namespace 'llvm::ARM'; did you mean > 'VST1d64TPseudoWB_fixed'? > case ARM::VLD1d64TPseudoWB_fixed: > ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > VST1d64TPseudoWB_fixed > ./ARMGenInstrInfo.inc.h:1969:5: note: 'VST1d64TPseudoWB_fixed' declared here > VST1d64TPseudoWB_fixed = 1953, > ^ > /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmarmcodegen/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp:3704:15: > error: no member named > 'VLD1d64QPseudoWB_fixed' in namespace 'llvm::ARM'; did you mean > 'VST1d64QPseudoWB_fixed'? > case ARM::VLD1d64QPseudoWB_fixed: > ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > VST1d64QPseudoWB_fixed > ./ARMGenInstrInfo.inc.h:1963:5: note: 'VST1d64QPseudoWB_fixed' declared here > VST1d64QPseudoWB_fixed = 1947, > -----
I've seen others report this error recently, and it was caused by an update to clang. There's a dependency glitch so that some header files don't get regenerated correctly; I think that has been fixed, but to get the fix in place you have to clean out obj/arm.armv6 and build fresh. -- Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
