Hi, I thought I'd already fixed this a year or so ago. Looking at my system, I see this in cdefs.h:
/* C++11 exposes a load of C99 stuff */ #if defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus >= 201103L #define __LONG_LONG_SUPPORTED #ifndef __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS #endif #ifndef __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS #define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS #endif #endif So, if you're compiling C++ and the C++ standard is C++11 or later, we define the __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS macros. If it's C++98, you can define them yourself. Do you have a test case where this doesn't work? David On 20 May 2014, at 11:11, Shane Ambler <free...@shaneware.biz> wrote: > When including stdint.h in c++ we can #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS so > that we get macros like INT32_MAX defined. > > Also related is __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS > > I have recently found that the need for these has been removed within > the c++11 standard. > > This year old bug report was to update glibc to this end - > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15366 > > Also of note is that Apple removed the use of this macro from OSX with > the release of 10.9 over a year ago > http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-2422.1.72/EXTERNAL_HEADERS/stdint.h > > I believe as we push to use llvm's libc++ and support for c++11 we > should also make sure the rest of our sources are kept up to date as > well. > > Are there any other changes within c++11 or c++14 that we should be > looking to update? > > Shane > _______________________________________________ > firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"