> On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or "Build it all". >> If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should be added to it >> when WITHOUT_X11 is set to prevent wasting time on it. > > We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph > and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a > headless server, there's no reason to build any of the kde-* or gnome-* ports > or, indeed, X itself. I suspect that we could easily trim 2/3 of the build > time by omitting ports that have a GUI, GUI toolkits, and so on.
Yeah. My point was more that poudriere can't do that now and I would rather not add all that special-case logic to it. Clever make.conf logic might be able to do it. > > Longer term, we may be able to share the build time a bit. Ports which don't > have a WITHOUT_X11 flag and don't unconditionally depend on X11 can > potentially be pre-seeded from the normal package build (if we can identify > them). That only leaves the ports that actually have build-time conditional > X support to build in the no-Xorg run. Yup! I have a patch for that in the works. > > David _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"