On 29 May 2014 13:18, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> anyway. Besides all of this - I'm thinking of just introducing: >> >> typedef uint32_t cpuid_t; >> >> .. then once we've converted all the users, we can make NOCPU >> something other than 255 (which is the other limiting factor here..) >> >> Any objections? > > This one is a bit harder as you'll have to do shims for kinfo_proc, but > I think this is fine. You could also just use u_int, but a new foo_t > isn't that bad I guess.
I don't think I'd modify any userland-facing ABI/KBI's just yet. I'm just worried that 11.0-REL will come out before we have made a decent inroads into this and we _can't_ support > 254 CPUs. -a _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"