On 04 Jun 2014, at 15:49, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> if I read correctly the code, there are a few network device drivers
> (igb, ixgbe, i40e, vtnet, vmxnet) where ifp->if_transmit(ifp, m)
> can return ENOBUFS even when 'm' has _not_ been dropped:
> e1000/if_igb.c :: igb_mq_start()
> can return ENOBUFS from igb_xmit()
> ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c :: ixgbe_mq_start_locked()
> can return ENOBUFS from ixgbe_xmit()
> (similar for i40)
> virtio/network/if_vtnet.c :: vtnet_txq_mq_start
> can return ENOBUFS if virtqueue_full()
> In all these cases, the error comes from a later attempt to transfer
> mbufs from the buf_ring to the NIC ring.
> All drivers using if_transmit() seem correct, as well as a bunch
> of others (cxgbe, sfxge, mxge ...) that reassign if_transmit and I
> checked for correctness.
> I think that when the current buffer has been queued, returning
> ENOBUFS is extremely confusing and should not be done.
> I would also argue that the return from ifp->if_transmit(ifp, m)
> should only tell what happened to 'm', not other things
> such as the status of the queue.
> Any objections if i fix the above drivers ?
I started a discussion on this last december on net@. The subject
of the thread was 'A small fix for if_em.c, if_igb.c, if_ixgbe.c'.
I think Adrian wanted to put the latest version of the patch in but
possibly never did... See the last mail from Jan 5th.
> (For those curious: i found this issue when using emulated
> netmap mode on top of a standard driver. The netmap emulation
> code assumes that ENOBUFS indicates that the driver has
> m_free()'d the mbuf, same as it happens on linux, and the
> bug was causing panics in my system).
> firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"