On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues <rodr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
> >> unfortunately.  This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which
> >> was *not* redundant. :-/
> > 
> > 
> > Warner,
> > 
> > Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without
> > the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag?
> > It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion.
> OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 
> almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate 
> the 9 on current case). I don’t see the problem being talked about at all. As 
> for 9 on 10, I was also able to do a build, but my 10.x system may not have 
> been pristine.

Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the
hell the came into play.

It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9
userland.  It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works.


Attachment: pgpYeCFRFGObO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to