On 7/15/14, Bruno Lauzé <brunola...@msn.com> wrote: > I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI really > think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software, > imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev, > libprop and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd. > Am i missing a point or is this in contradiction witch any of freebsd > objectives? > Let me know your thoughts... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >
In FreeBSD exists similar utility like udev, the so called devd. In github is there a project, which would improve the compatibility or completely change the udev like brain-damage. https://github.com/freebsd/libdevq Other problem with udev is, that moving so fast, and every time changed their API, and udev's future are not clear, possibly merged with systemd. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
