The flow in both directions has to include: * better locking / parallelism * virtualised forwarding support (ie, vimage)
If he's happy to include some stubs for that, then sure. I think both dfbsd and freebsd can use the same pf. -a On 26 July 2014 08:27, Mark Felder <f...@freebsd.org> wrote: > We've already heard of Henning offering to help port a new pf but the olive > branch has been extended even further. He responded to some comments of mine > on twitter: > > @HenningBrauer: @rhymebyter @feldpos I offered help/advice to whomever > seriously attempts to update pf in @dragonflybsd AND @freebsd. > > @HenningBrauer: @feldpos it takes someone in freebsd/netbsd/dragonfly to > update their ancient pf versions, then code can flow bidirectional > > Technical hurdles aside, that sounds like the beginning of an OpenPf to me... > _______________________________________________ > email@example.com mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"