The flow in both directions has to include:

* better locking / parallelism
* virtualised forwarding support (ie, vimage)

If he's happy to include some stubs for that, then sure. I think both
dfbsd and freebsd can use the same pf.


On 26 July 2014 08:27, Mark Felder <> wrote:
> We've already heard of Henning offering to help port a new pf but the olive 
> branch has been extended even further. He responded to some comments of mine 
> on twitter:
> @HenningBrauer: @rhymebyter @feldpos I offered help/advice to whomever 
> seriously attempts to update pf in @dragonflybsd AND @freebsd.
> @HenningBrauer: @feldpos it takes someone in freebsd/netbsd/dragonfly to 
> update their ancient pf versions, then code can flow bidirectional
> Technical hurdles aside, that sounds like the beginning of an OpenPf to me...
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""

Reply via email to