me wrote:
we are talking about NAT64 (IPv6-only datacenter's path to a legacy world), and NPT66 (prefix transalation). I doubt anyone had a traditional NAT in mind.

Kevin Oberman wrote:
No, all of the messages in the thread are specific about NAT66, not NPT66.
NPT66 may have real value. I hate it, but it may well be better than
alternatives. [...]

Cy Schubert wrote:
That I don't disagree with, IPv6 NAT makes no logical sense. Having said
that I've received emails asking about NAT66 specifically. It is on
people's minds.

My impression is that often the term NAT66 is used indiscriminately,
even when NPT66 (static prefix translation) is meant.

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""

Reply via email to