August 26 2014 2:49 PM, "Garrett Cooper" <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not just require ksh93 from ports?
Because zfsd is going to be in base, not in ports. Everything in base needs to
work without any ports requirements. Also ksh93 has been... problematic. It has
a history of breaking on i386, sparc64, current, etc. It's not exactly a
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"