Am 07.10.2014 um 21:32 schrieb Antoine Brodin:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Matthias Andree <mand...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> I have just updated sysutils/e2fsprogs and its slave ports(*), and test
>> drove them on redports. The self-test suite is failing on 11-CURRENT
>> i386 and amd64, but not on 10 or older releases.
>> 11-amd64: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007190638-31576
>> 11-i386: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007185700-4151
>> I am now wondering
>> - if there are issues with the toolchain on 11 that causes
>> miscompilation, or
>> - whether 11 is misbehaving on redports, or
>> - if e2fsprogs has code bugs that don't show on older toolchains.
> e2fsprogs version 1.42.10 tests were succeeding in a jail with a world
> from r272576 (1.5 day old)
> (this is poudriere, not tinderbox)
merci for that.
There are probably multiple changes, so if someone else can take the
newer 1.42.12 for a test on 11-current, either on a naked system or with
poudriere, that will be appreciated. What I find odd is that the
redports logs also show output deviations from expected, for instance,
> --- r_resize_inode/expect 2014-08-25 03:08:16.000000000 +0000
> +++ r_resize_inode.log 2014-10-07 19:10:00.000000000 +0000
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> mke2fs -q -F -O resize_inode -o Linux -b 1024 -g 1024 test.img 16384
> resize2fs test.img 65536
> Resizing the filesystem on test.img to 65536 (1k) blocks.
> -The filesystem on test.img is now 65536 (1k) blocks long.
> +The filesystem on test.img is now 65536 (1480342k) blocks long.
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
The block size is bogus, and this happens on i386 and amd64 so is not
/obviously/ an issue of sizeof(long) or thereabouts.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"