On 05/12/2014 13:07, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:

On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:

I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
folks at Emulex to maintain this driver.  He is probably the best person to
review this.

Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these fixes have been 
applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as I know, the "oce" 
driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to cause a panic reliably within 30 
Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & releng/10.1 seem 
pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is reporting panics very similar to 
this thread.

Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in?
Not as far as I know. I´ve updated a couple of machines here to 10-STABLE and 
I've been applying the patch manually myself.

I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD.

For now I've told my coworkers to avoid Emulex cards whenever possible. As far 
as  I know the driver is unusable in its present state.
Thanks for the quick reply Borja, review of the patch is now up:

Hopefully we can get this in the tree and make oce usable moving forward.

freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to