On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I came across some build issues in libc.so and SSP.
> libc.ldscript (aka libc.so) unconditionally includes
> libssp* are not built if WITHOUT_SSP defined.
> ObsoleteFiles.inc doesn't mention libssp*.
> Consider WITHOUT_SSP=yes case. As soon as one does clean installworld
> and/or removes stale libssp_nonshared.a ld fails to link anything
> because of missing libssp_nonshared.a
I think nowadays it would make sense to get it of WITHOUT_SSP
altogether. This will turn this into a non-issue.
> libc.so during buildworld (as found under /usr/obj) is symlink to the
> actual shared library, but not ldscript. Is it intentional? I wouldn't
> expect make -C /usr/src/bin/cat to match buildworld result closely
> assuming src and world are in sync, but they seem to have different idea
> of what libc is..
I don't remember the details except this was pretty twisted :). I
don't work enough on this subject to keep it warm in my head and each
time I need to go back to it, it takes me hours.
The code is here if you want to give a try:
Jeremie Le Hen
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"