> I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha=
> t I
> want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old =
> =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> Best regards,
I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
remove old make without notice ?
In FreeBSD-9.3 :
bmake is not default, merely there
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 518032 Nov 5 16:58 /usr/bin/bmake*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 453176 Nov 5 16:58 /usr/bin/make*
& man make has No Warning people should migrate to bmake.
Has Only one /usr/bin/*make (& no make.old)
& No warning that it's a new make called bmake or what if any differences
might be from make in 9.
cd ~ ; find . -type f -name Makefile | wc -l # 739
Use of FreeBSD is not merely to rebuild FreeBSD, but to support users who
want to trust FreeBSD to provide predictable functional stability.
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
Indent previous with "> ". Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script.
Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"