On Sun, 7 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:

# It wouldn't cover the particular obscure case, but this is the sort of

It was a pretty bizarre case, but the old code did cover this.
Not saying whether I think it to be correct or not but... :)

# thing that SUSv2's basename(3) would be appropriate for.  I have an
# implementation waiting in the wings....

Cool.  I'd like to see a fix get into RELENG_[34] and HEAD
so having a fix that doesn't require a new libc is probably
more appropriate for the RELEASE'd branches at least.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to