On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:12:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
>On May 11, 2015 9:10 AM, "Steve Kargl" <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
>>> On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" <lars.eng...@0x20.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
>>>>> Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make
>>>>> much more sense to import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations
>>>>> this day and age when better
>>>>> tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn
>>>>> something new, which I know can be a challenge.
>>>> I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it
>>>> would soon be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages.
>>> It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better
>>> installed from ports/packages, too.
>>> It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS.
>> Please, just stop. Thanks.
> Like I said, a challenge.
You've completely missed the point. OpenRCS is intended
to replace ancient GNU RCS, which is already included in the
base system and used by a few scripts. Fossil is not a
drop-in replacement for the rcs utilities.
So, please just stop.
PS: Please reply to the list not directly to me. CC stored.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"