> On 8 Jul 2015, at 08:11, Garrett Wollman <woll...@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> 
> wrote:
> Perhaps the test was (erroneously) written to assume that
> gettimeofday() was a system call, and could therefore detect invalid
> pointers and return [EFAULT].  This has not been the case for some
> time.  (In HEAD, not since r237434, which is three years ago.)

In defence of the test, the man page says it can return EFAULT.

(IMO the man page and test should change..)

Daniel O'Connor
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
 -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to