> On 8 Jul 2015, at 08:11, Garrett Wollman <woll...@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> > wrote: > Perhaps the test was (erroneously) written to assume that > gettimeofday() was a system call, and could therefore detect invalid > pointers and return [EFAULT]. This has not been the case for some > time. (In HEAD, not since r237434, which is three years ago.)
In defence of the test, the man page says it can return EFAULT. (IMO the man page and test should change..) -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"