In article <capq4ffvem2uzi-qptm_6msneelwft814g1ke4rgxu6mrzwy...@mail.gmail.com>, oliver.pin...@hardenedbsd.org writes:
>Btw, I have found this is atf's documantation: >atf_tc_expect_signal(SIGSEGV, "reaseon"), with this, we could mark the >specific test case could "fail" / or expect to coredump. No. I'm not sure why people are having trouble understanding this. The test in question is not valid C. It is entirely erroneous, and should be deleted. Merely computing the value "(void *)-1" is allowed to perform LITERALLY ANY ACTION AT ALL, including turning your computer into a frog. The compiler is free to implement this as a call to abort() if it chooses. Testing this is nonsensical. -GAWollman _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"