On 04.11.2015 00:10, David Wolfskill wrote: > So... with the change from r290334, what's the point of the KASSERT?
Yes, you are right. We changed this code and use it some time, but without INVARIANTS. I just removed this KASSERT in r290345. Can you try this revision? Sorry for the breakage. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Description: OpenPGP digital signature