On 04.11.2015 00:10, David Wolfskill wrote:
> So... with the change from r290334, what's the point of the KASSERT?

Yes, you are right. We changed this code and use it some time, but
without INVARIANTS. I just removed this KASSERT in r290345. Can you try
this revision? Sorry for the breakage.

WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to