In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manfred Antar writes:
>>--- vfs_subr.c~ Sat May 6 00:08:38 2000
>>+++ vfs_subr.c Sat May 13 21:47:08 2000
>>@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@
>> return (error);
>> vp = nvp;
>>- vp->v_type = VBLK;
>>+ vp->v_type = VCHR;
>> addalias(vp, dev);
>> *vpp = vp;
>> return (0);
>That works for me too .
Yes, that looks correct.
>Which is the correct dev /dev/da0a , /dev/rda0a , or /dev/da0s1a to use
>rda0a won't work. da0a works fine and I got rid of all the da0s1a,b,e,f,g ones ?
In all likelyhood /dev/da0s1a is the one you should use.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message