On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> writes:
>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper
>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth
>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port.
> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still
> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far
> less intrusive than HPN.

Yes, it's very small.

Bryan Drewery

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to