On 2015-11-11 19:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>>  I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
>>> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
>>> base).
>> Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no
>> complaints. It was just reported and fixed upstream in the last day and
>> I wrote in a similar fix in the port. That speaks a lot about its usage
>> in the port currently.
> I am try using NPH/NONE with base ssh and confused: don't see
> performance rise, too complex to enable and too complex for use.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

I did a few quick (and dirty) benchmarks and it shows that the NONE
cipher definitely makes a difference. Version of OpenSSL also seems to
make a difference, as one might expect.

Note: openssh from ports seems to link against both base and ports
libcrypto, I am still trying to make sure this isn't corrupting my
benchmark results.

I am still debugging my dummynet setup to be able to prove that HPN
makes a difference (but it does).


Allan Jude

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to