On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:55:25 +0100 Edward Tomasz Napierała <tr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 0303T1047, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Does FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) support for Microsoft's SMBv3 protocol > > introduced with Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012/R2? > > No, it only supports the obsolete SMB1 (aka CIFS) protocol. Since SMB2 > is a completely different protocol, supporting it properly pretty much > requires implementing it from scratch. SMB3 is one of the SMB2 revisions > and thus is backward compatible with SMB2. > [...] Thank you very much for this clearification. This explains much strange behaviour I faced. Do you see any chance that this gets fixed in a forseable time? Linux seems to support SMBv3 by now. Or is a support considered obsolete and handled via /net/samba43? For a security appliance, I try to avoid as much packages as possible, so therefore my concerns regarding mount_smbfs. Thanks you very much, O. Hartmann _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"