Hi. Is there any setting about"Secure Boot"? *Maybe all Windoze7 (or later) generation ThinkPads would have it.
If so, disable it INSTEAD OF "Security Chip" and try. On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:54:46 -0500 Kyle Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > I recently purchased an older Thinkpad Yoga 11e and now I've installed > 10.3RC2 to it. It appears that the Security Chip feature causes > problems in attempting to boot 10.3RC2 (and a slightly older -CURRENT, > as well, but re-tested with 10.3RC2 just for the sake of > verification). The following output is written when attempting to boot > from the `amd64-uefi-memstick.img`: > > == > > >> FreeBSD EFI boot block > Loader path: /boot/loader.efi > LoadImage failed with error 2 > HandleProtocol failed with error 2 > StartImage failed with error 2 > panic: Load failed > > == > > Rebooting and disabling the security chip fixes this, and everything > runs along nicely. Re-enabling the Security Chip after 10.3RC2 is > installed and attempting a boot yields the slightly different (while > slightly expected, given the above, but I'm adding this anyways): > > == > > >> FreeBSD EFI boot block > Loader Path: /boot/loader.efi > > Initializing modules: ZFS UFS > Probing 4 block devices. . . . . .* done > ZFS found the following pools: zroot > UFS found no partitions > Failed to load image provided by ZFS, size: 2033504512, (2) > panic: No bootable partitions found! > > == > > Is this expected behavior? I was under the impression that the > "Security Chip" was largely unrelated to anything in the boot process. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > -- Tomoaki AOKI [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
