On 04/19/16 13:26, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This is kind of a silly argument here since the code change is trivial.
There is a potentially large impact on the system that merits
discussion. Moreover, there is a whole bunch of other code still needs
to be written to make this workable in production that depends to some
degree on what choices are made here: what does pkg show for these? How
do upgrades work? The installer needs modifications to use pkg instead
of tar. It's not clear what the migration path to/from a packaged system
is, since the packaging is apparently optional.
In message <1461096962.1232.32.ca...@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore writes:
Oh yeah, now I remember: Because in freebsd, design is decided by a
race to commit rather than by discussion.
No, that's not it.
It is because code talks much louder than words.
If it would help, I am happy to generate a patch to make the discussion
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"