On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Eischen <deisc...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> [CC trimmed] > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> I personally will be refraining from engaging further. I plan on seeing >> what gaps there are by adding support to NanoBSD for packages. I'll be >> busy >> with that. In talking to Glen and others, we've already identified a few >> easy gaps to fill. Once they've done that, I'll get going on NanoBSD with >> the goal to be able to use it to build a bootable system of any >> architecture from packages with no root privs. I expect to find issues, >> but >> I don't expect to find any issue that's intractable. I expect after the >> issues are resolved, the end product will be better for everybody. >> > > Thank you for working on NanoBSD. Do you think it would be possible > to add support for optionally building dump(8) images instead of dd? What do you mean by that, exactly? It would be relatively easy to add a step that runs dump on the _.disk.image file and squirrel that away. Last orders the code currently calls it, I believe. Is it something as simple as this, or is there some more complexity that I'm failing to understand or grasp? Warner _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"