On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that
> > otherwise violates POLA?  The commit recently was intended to revert
> > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this
> > affects.
> >
> > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here?
> >
> > Glen
> >
> I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels
> by default.
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=299088&view=markup
> Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the
> commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its
> interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as
> the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement.

I think there is a communication breakdown somewhere, then.

But, I also realize we are talking about two different commits.  (Which
is why I CC'd glebius@ in the previous reply.)

Since ngie@ already chimed in, I'll defer unless required to chime in.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to