On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:12:34PM +0100, Miguel C wrote: > Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards > ----------------------------------------------- > *Miguel Clara* > *IT - Sys Admin & Developer* > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 08:46:49PM +0100, Miguel C wrote: > > > Just as a note using netgraph (with jng script as a workaround) works.... > > > > > > Also manually creating a bridge in the domu and adding xn0 as a member > > > makes this fail.... so the issue is indeed related to the bridge. > > > > > > I'll open a PR later in case someone want to look into it, but I'm happy > > it > > > works with netgraph. > > > > I seem to be able to use xn* interfaces with bridges without problems: > > > > xn0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 > > mtu 1500 > > options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> > > ether 00:16:3e:74:3d:76 > > nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> > > media: Ethernet manual > > status: active > > bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu > > 1500 > > ether 02:77:3d:4a:18:00 > > inet 172.16.1.140 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.1.255 > > nd6 options=9<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED> > > groups: bridge > > id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 > > maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 > > root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 > > member: xn0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> > > ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 2000000 > > > > Is this a GENERIC kernel or are you using some custom > > configuration/patches? > > Can you provide some more information about how to reproduce this? > > > > GENERIC + VIMAGE, but that's just it, no other custom changes or patches. > > Note however that this is under a NetbBSD Dom0, and I see the "vifXX" > interface disappear in the Dom0 side when the bridge is create on FreeBSD > DomU. > > I'm actually happy with netgraph, although I've never played with it, and > seems more complex, the script provide in /share/examples is perfect to use > with "jail.conf" and pf seems happy in FreeBSD-11 (which is not CURRENT, > should we move this to a different mailing list!?) too, no panics so far. > > I suspect the main issue, since it works fine for you is the fact that this > is in a NetBSD Dom0.
Oh, from your previous email I thought that it was the interface inside of the DomU that disappeared. Does then same happen on a NetBSD Dom0 with a NetBSD DomU? Roger. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"