On 14/10/2016 18:11, Michael Gmelin wrote: > For some history on these changes, please see also  and  (there > were a few discussions and the revision was bumped, I also tried to > get some attention, but not enough it seems). > > Given your recent changes to iicbus in HEAD, I think it would be best to > MFC those and go with Option 4 or, if that's to drastic, go with > Option 1.
I am leaning towards this approach as well. > Thanks for cleaning after me. You asked for a discussion and reviews. I can not recall what I was doing at that time, but I completely ignored the development and for that I can only blame myself. > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-March/016972.html > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-May/017157.html I also agree that having a thin library on top of the ioctl would be a convenience. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"