On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:48, Pete Wright wrote:

On 1/6/17 9:14 AM, Matthew Macy wrote:


I just did the merge and it's using a relatively untested new KPI so regressions aren't too surprising I'm afraid. #96 is more or less content free in terms of providing useful information. Getting a core + backtrace would be a lot more helpful. See the repo's wiki for details on improving your odds of getting a core.


I have found the following has enabled me to catch kernel panic's pretty reliably on the drm-next branch when i have the i915kms module loaded:

dev.drm.skip_ddb=1

Excellent: I turned that on and got a core, then got another core while tar'ing up the first core. :)

The machine in question is currently not connected to any network (iwm is being a bit unhappy), but once it is, where can I put the tarball?


Jon
--
jonathan.ander...@ieee.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to