Is the following a bug or feature. I observe that the first thread in a procedure is not passed to thread_dtor as declared by the following eventhandler, when the procedure exits.

EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE(thread_dtor, thread_dtor_fn);

Is this a bug or feature?

I see a couple of clients in the kernel and if the first thread in proc is simply recycled by re-init, we're leaking data for these clients?
And I'm planning to add one more for the LinuxKPI.

Any insight?

freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to