On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > Summary of the transition interval: > > > > So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good > > idea to avoid anything that is after -r313254 > > and before -r314474 in head. (Would this be > > appropriate for a UPDATING notice given its > > span?) > > > > There may be other architectures that might have > > a similar status(?): the last fixes involved were > > not in Machine Dependent code. (Some architectures > > are apparently insensitive to the errors, such as > > amd64). > > > > When following current you are expected to be on the newest revision, > so I don't think mentioning interim broken releases makes much sense. >
Documenting the range may aid those bisecting src/ to find a bug. How is one to know that anything in the range that Mark points out should be skipped on powerpc64? -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
