On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:51:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" <ohartm...@walstatt.org> wrote:

> When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using FreeBSD 
> base, it
> seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD world 
> uses x86:64,
> FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used inconsistently all over the 
> places?
> I run into trouble setting up some package- and base-servers and ran into the 
> problem
> when deleting - not thinking of this discovered inconsistency - some links on 
> the servers
> regarding FreeBSD:12:x86:64 (the same is for 11-STABLE).
> Can someone shed some light onto this? 
> What am I supposed to use now? The handbook referes to amd64, so I thought 
> poudriere
> would, too. 
> Thanks in advance,
> oh
> -- 
> O. Hartmann
> Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für
> Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).

[ not using poudriere yet ]
/me too
I think three places [ etc/pkg, /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos, 2nd place in base, ]
  fourth:  hard coded DESPITE the above in the current DB in var/db/pkg?
  fifth: derived somehow from uname -a?

here: freebsd:12:x86:32
... when this issue resolved, could it please be added to 'man 
pkg|poudriere|syntch|portmaster?|portupgrade?  [ the latter two when developed 
further ]'
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to