On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:57 AM, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:51:23PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote:
> > ....
> > > Question: Should one expect a wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 executable built
> > > under FreeBSD stable/11 (amd64) to work on the same hardware, but
> > > running head?
> > Did you run the version from ports, or did you run the base /etc/rc.d
> > script with your rc.conf set to point to the ports binary? This will run
> > the command with -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf overriding the ports
> > So this is expected to work in this way.
> Ah. When I installed the port, I was reminded:
> | ...
> | ===> Registering installation for wpa_supplicant-2.6_2
> | Installing wpa_supplicant-2.6_2...
> | To use the ports version of WPA Supplicant instead of the base, add:
> | wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant"
> | to /etc/rc.conf
> | ===> SECURITY REPORT:
> | ....
> So I did that. I did not do anything to the existing
> /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant, which had been installed as part of base
> > ....
> David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
> Unsubstantiated claims of "Fake News" are evidence that the claimant lies
> See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
Possibly silly question, but are any of the defaults for the port different
from those on the base system? DEBUG_* seem most likely to differ, but I'd
like to know if there are any others.
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"