On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:57 AM, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:51:23PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: > > .... > > > Question: Should one expect a wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 executable built > > > under FreeBSD stable/11 (amd64) to work on the same hardware, but > > > running head? > > > > Did you run the version from ports, or did you run the base /etc/rc.d > > script with your rc.conf set to point to the ports binary? This will run > > the command with -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf overriding the ports > default. > > > > So this is expected to work in this way. > > Ah. When I installed the port, I was reminded: > > | ... > | ===> Registering installation for wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 > | Installing wpa_supplicant-2.6_2... > | To use the ports version of WPA Supplicant instead of the base, add: > | > | wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" > | > | to /etc/rc.conf > | > | ===> SECURITY REPORT: > | .... > > So I did that. I did not do anything to the existing > /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant, which had been installed as part of base > FreeBSD. > > > .... > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org > Unsubstantiated claims of "Fake News" are evidence that the claimant lies > again. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. > Possibly silly question, but are any of the defaults for the port different from those on the base system? DEBUG_* seem most likely to differ, but I'd like to know if there are any others. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"