On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 03:03:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > ... > So, it is dangerous to update beyond r327121? I'm running on most of our > machines now > r327121 and it does not show nay anomalies so far ... > > Regards, > Oliver > .....
Hmm... Well, reviewing the output from "svn log", I see that the next commit to head after r327121 is r327140 -- a change to head/sbin/ipfw. I have a hard time imagining how that could possibly affect anything during the kernel device probes prior to the transition from single- to multi-user mode. So at this stage, I have no indication that what I observed in both of my machines that track head will necessarily be seen by others. I could try r327121, perhaps... Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org If Trump is "taking names" re: the UN Jerusalem vote, he can add mine. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
