So something like this:

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 51d3688f8b8..3e6584f24a1 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ kqueue                jmg     Pre-commit review
requested.  Documentation Required.
 libdpv         dteske  Pre-commit review requested. Keep in sync with
dpv(1).
 libfetch       des     Pre-commit review requested, email only.
 libfigpar      dteske  Pre-commit review requested.
+libm           freebsd-numerics        Send email with patches to
freebsd-numerics@
 libpam         des     Pre-commit review requested, email only.
 linprocfs      des     Pre-commit review requested, email only.
 lpr            gad     Pre-commit review requested, particularly for

is what you're suggesting?

Warner

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com>
wrote:

> I wasn't saying Steve has a lock however in case non-committers might feel
> they do, addressing all points in my reply. Not saying anyone feels this
> way today but we should consider this in whatever we decide here
> (considering all possibilities). IMO adding subject matter experts to
> MAINTAINERS seems like the easiest way to document who might be the go-to
> person.
>
> ---
> Sent using a tiny phone keyboard.
> Apologies for any typos and autocorrect.
> Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies.
>
> Cy Schubert
> <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> or <c...@freebsd.org>
> The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
> ---
> ------------------------------
> From: Warner Losh
> Sent: 15/07/2018 12:09
> To: Cy Schubert
> Cc: Ian Lepore; K. Macy; Steve Kargl; FreeBSD Current
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Recent libm additions
>
> I'm not saying that he has a lock. I'm saying he's are domain expert and
> many mistakes can be avoided by talking to him.
>
> I'm saying we have history here, and that history, while poorly
> documented, wasn't followed. To the extent it is poorly documented, we
> should fix that.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it makes sense for a non-committer to have a lock on
>> anything in base. However a request for review makes a lot of sense. If a
>> non-committer or former committer is the SME on a particular subject it's
>> best that they be consulted even if they don't request it. IMO more input
>> is better. Where better to document this than in MAINTAINERS.
>>
>> Having said all this. If a person is a former committer and it's not
>> documented, how are we to know?
>>
>> If people agree, should we start documenting SMEs in MAINTAINERS?
>>
>> ---
>> Sent using a tiny phone keyboard.
>> Apologies for any typos and autocorrect.
>> Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies.
>>
>> Cy Schubert
>> <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> or <c...@freebsd.org>
>> The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
>> ---
>> ------------------------------
>> From: Ian Lepore
>> Sent: 15/07/2018 11:08
>> To: Warner Losh; K. Macy
>> Cc: Steve Kargl; FreeBSD Current
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Recent libm additions
>>
>> On Sun, 2018-07-15 at 11:55 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 11:23 AM K. Macy <km...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Well, actually, the functions in polevll.c should have been
>> > > > copied
>> > > > into ld80/e_powl.c, and polevall.c should never have been
>> > > > committed.
>> > > > Unfortunately, the code was not reviewed for correctness.
>> > > That is not correct. Please stop repeating it. Bruce Evans and John
>> > > Baldwin were both looped in. Neither made this observation.
>> > >
>> > Steve is the fp guy these days. And it wasn't reviewed by him. He's
>> > mad you
>> > cut him out of the loop. Arguing about pedantic points of process
>> > does no
>> > one any good.
>> >
>> > Warner
>>
>> On the other hand, what information is there for someone to know that
>> Steve should be involved in a review? There is nothing in MAINTAINERS.
>> The review was on phab for almost a month, and phab is supposedly the
>> preferred way to do reviews these days.
>>
>> Steve is no longer a committer, but that doesn't preclude him having a
>> phab account and participating in reviews. If he doesn't like using
>> phab (and I can certainly understand that POV), an entry in MAINTAINERS
>> would still be helpful, unless we have a rule that only committers can
>> be listed in there.
>>
>> -- Ian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
>> "
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to