On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Eitan Adler <ead...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:27, Kyle Evans <kev...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:46:39PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
>> >>
>> >> He now gets a little further, but ends up with the same panic due to
>> >> efirtc_probe trying to get time to verify the rtc's actually
>> >> implemented. What kind of approach must we take to ensure curcpu is
>> >> synced?
>> >
>> > It does not panic for me, when I load efirt.ko from the loader prompt.
>> > Anyway, try this
>>
>> Right, I also don't get a panic on any of my machines from this.
>> Hopefully he'll have a chance to try this soon.
>
> This change has no impact: it still panics in the same way as without the 
> patch.
>

That seems indicative of a bigger problem, since we use proc0
throughout all these bits so we should still be dealing with the same
pmap that got passed to pmap_pinit0 when we grab
curthread->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to